Texas governor Perry attacks Ohman cartoon

Last week the Sacramento Bee published this Jack Ohman cartoon:

Screen shot 2013-04-29 at 1.20.05 PMGovernor Rick Perry, who obviously doesn’t understand the point of the cartoon, felt the need to write to the newspaper and demand an apology.  Jack eloquently responded to the governor’s letter here.

Texas Lt. Governor Dewhurst  added his thoughts on twitter:Screen shot 2013-04-29 at 11.36.08 AMA couple of colorful tweets from readers who don’t care for the cartoon:

Screen shot 2013-04-29 at 1.58.30 PMScreen shot 2013-04-29 at 4.01.16 PM

Jack’s a big boy.  He can handle criticism; it comes with the job.  The sentiments above are not the problem.  However, he has been receiving threats -which is not ok.  I don’t care what people think the cartoon says or doesn’t say, everyone has the right to express an opinion without fearing for one’s life, editorial cartoonists included.  If you’re angry or offended by a cartoon, you have every right to criticize it- write a letter to the editor, tweet your outrage, draw your own cartoon.  What you don’t have the right to do is threaten or intimidate people for what they say or draw.

For those people people who are still confused  I suggest taking a look at our First Amendment (it’s right before that Second one).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 bombs explode at Boston Marathon

Terrible news- 2 bombs exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon yesterday, killing 3 and injuring over 100 people.  Events like this send the television media into overdrive, filling airtime with speculation rather than actual news and facts.  Let’s hope the coverage doesn’t spiral into non-stop, emotionally driven, 24 hour reporting.  I’m not hopeful, though.020203ShuttleColumbia

Thomas Jefferson and the Separation of Church & State

C-Span opened its Washington Journal program this morning with the question “Should religion play a role in politics?”,which led me to think about  Thomas Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists and the issue of Separation of Church and State.  Several years ago I was fortunate to see at the original at the Library of Congress:danbury_2Very cool.

Historic week for gay marriage and equal rights

Crowds line up for gay marriage cases. Photo by David Lloyd

Crowds line up for gay marriage cases. Photo by David Lloyd

Today the Supreme Court of the United States will hear the first of two cases for same-sex marriage.  Opponents will argue that legalizing these unions will destroy the traditional definition of marriage since marriage is about “responsible procreation and child-rearing” (tell that to couples who choose not to have children or the elderly couple who have found happiness again).  This is a simple question of equal rights. Why shouldn’t gays, who pay taxes and participate in society just like anyone else, be able to marry?  Churches will still be able to decide which couples can be married within the church; this will not impact them.  It will be interesting to see which Justices support the Separation of Church and State and which ones are still living in the pre-Loving v. Virginia era.